Advertising / Marketing Services·London, United Kingdom·Founded 1971

WPP sustainability score: 43/100

WPP is a London-based advertising and marketing communications conglomerate founded in 1971, employing 109,000 people globally.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

43/100
Below expectations-6 since last review
4th of 4 in Advertising / Marketing Services
Pending reviewStrong evidence· 14 src

WPP has achieved meaningful operational carbon reductions (82% since 2019) and renewable energy coverage, but these gains are overwhelmed by unverified Scope 3 emissions and structural complicity. The company holds 79 fossil fuel contracts—more than any competitor—and two ASA-upheld rulings for misleading advertising confirm systematic greenwashing for major polluters including Shell and Toyota.

WPP scores 43/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.

That places WPP joint 296th of 847 companies scored, and 4th of 4 in Advertising / Marketing Services.

At a glance

WPP's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its own operations7/10
  • Whether its emissions are falling7/10
Weakest
  • Its record on controversies0/10
  • Its effect on nature3/10
See all ten questions ↓
WPP in context

How does WPP compare with other advertising / marketing services companies?

WPP sits at the bottom of the advertising / marketing services pack.

Among the 4 major advertising / marketing services brands we've scored, WPP sits 4th of 4.

4/4
WPP's rank
47
Industry average
43
Industry low
51
Industry high
See all 4 in Advertising / Marketing Services →
What would raise this score

Where WPP lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Its record on controversies0/10

    OECD complaint filed February 2025.

  2. Its effect on nature3/10

    No TNFD disclosure, deforestation commitment, or nature footprint quantified.

  3. How it uses materials and handles waste4/10

    No published waste tonnage, circular economy targets, or hardware lifecycle management.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For WPP

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is WPP doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Emissions Trajectory (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (0/10, 3/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 14 sources.

About WPP

WPP is a London-based advertising and marketing communications conglomerate founded in 1971, employing 109,000 people globally. It operates as one of the Big Six agency holding companies, providing creative, media planning, and digital services to multinational clients across consumer, financial, and energy sectors. The company generates revenue primarily from campaign development and media buying.

Founded
1971
Headquarters
London, United Kingdom
Employees
~109,000 (2022)
Annual revenue
~£14.9B
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.