Holcim reports comprehensive emissions data and leads in construction waste recycling, but relies overwhelmingly on intensity targets that mask stagnant absolute emissions and hide reliance on unproven CCUS technology. The Lafarge Syria terrorism financing case ($778M fine, ongoing French trial), the admitted climate lawsuit, and the Mormont quarry conflict expose fundamental tensions between extraction-based business models and credible sustainability.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Emissions Trajectory (2/10, 3/10).
21 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
11 of 21 sources are third-party verified or public record.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 12 major construction / real estate brands we've scored, Holcim is tied =10th of 12, with 2 others.
Score history begins 4 April 2026.
As Holcim's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Holcim is a Swiss multinational cement, aggregates, and ready-mix concrete producer, founded in 1912 and headquartered in Zug. With 2022 revenue of CHF 29.2 billion, it operates across 44 markets and is among the world's largest construction materials companies. The sector is carbon-intensive; cement production alone accounts for ~8% of global CO2 emissions.
Extractive industry peer with similar nature destruction footprint and polarized stakeholder engagement.
View breakdown →Heavy industrial carbonization challenge; intensity targets masking absolute emission stagnation.
View breakdown →Extractive peer navigating biodiversity liability, water impact, and intensity-vs-absolute reduction debate.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.