Higher Education / Universities

University of South Wales sustainability score: 53/100

University of South Wales is a public research and teaching institution based in Wales, with campuses in Treforest, Glyntaff, and Cardiff.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewMixed evidence· 10 src

USW has delivered solid operational emissions cuts (63% Scope 1+2 reduction since 2005) and locked in 100% renewable electricity since 2016/17, but recycling performance collapsed from 48% to 34% year-on-year, and supply chain emissions—89% of total footprint—remain unverified and largely unmanaged. Targets are self-set without SBTi validation.

University of South Wales scores 53/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified September 2026.

That places University of South Wales joint 80th of 847 companies scored, and joint 16th of 67 in Higher Education / Universities.

At a glance

University of South Wales's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Its record on controversies9/10
  • Emissions from its own operations7/10
Weakest
  • Its effect on nature4/10
  • How it uses materials and handles waste4/10
See all ten questions ↓
University of South Wales in context

How does University of South Wales compare with other higher education / universities companies?

Where University of South Wales sits among higher education / universities peers.

Among the 67 major higher education / universities brands we've scored, University of South Wales is tied =16th of 67, with 10 others.

=16/67
University of South Wales's rank
49
Industry average
20
Industry low
60
Industry high
See all 67 in Higher Education / Universities →
What would raise this score

Where University of South Wales lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Its effect on nature4/10

    No TNFD disclosure or verified ecosystem restoration beyond campus.

  2. How it uses materials and handles waste4/10

    HESA 2023/24 records 34% recycling rate—down sharply from 48% in 2022/23, missing the 70% target for 2025.

  3. Its climate targets4/10

    No SBTi commitment or validation.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For University of South Wales

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is University of South Wales doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Carbon Footprint — Operations (9/10, 7/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Resource Use & Waste (4/10, 4/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 10 sources.

About University of South Wales

University of South Wales is a public research and teaching institution based in Wales, with campuses in Treforest, Glyntaff, and Cardiff. It teaches across engineering, business, health, and creative disciplines.

Founded
—
Headquarters
GB
Employees
2,450 FTE (HESA EMR 2023/24)
Annual revenue
£243M (HESA EMR 2023/24)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.