Higher Education / Universities

University of Exeter sustainability score: 53/100

University of Exeter is a research-led institution in south-west England with four campuses.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewMixed evidence· 14 src

Exeter has cut operational emissions 45% since 2005 and ranks first globally for water management research. Total emissions remain 13% above 2018 baseline, driven by Scope 3 growth. The Shell partnership (£14.7M over five years) undercuts climate credibility despite the university's explicit shift away from offsetting.

University of Exeter scores 53/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified September 2026.

That places University of Exeter joint 80th of 847 companies scored, and joint 16th of 67 in Higher Education / Universities.

At a glance

University of Exeter's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its own operations7/10
  • Its effect on water7/10
Weakest
  • Whether its emissions are falling4/10
  • Its climate targets5/10
See all ten questions ↓
University of Exeter in context

How does University of Exeter compare with other higher education / universities companies?

Where University of Exeter sits among higher education / universities peers.

Among the 67 major higher education / universities brands we've scored, University of Exeter is tied =16th of 67, with 10 others.

=16/67
University of Exeter's rank
49
Industry average
20
Industry low
60
Industry high
See all 67 in Higher Education / Universities →
What would raise this score

Where University of Exeter lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Whether its emissions are falling4/10

    Scope 1+2 fell 45.3% from 2005 baseline; total Scope 1+2+3 emissions rose 13% from 2018/19 baseline to 104,043 tCO₂e in 2023/24.

  2. Its climate targets5/10

    SBTi-aligned (not validated) targets: 26% near-term reduction by 2030 to 76,856 tCO₂e; 90% long-term by 2050.

  3. Emissions from its supply chain6/10

    Procurement uses expenditure-based method, not supplier-specific engagement.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For University of Exeter

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is University of Exeter doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Water Impact (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Targets & Commitments (4/10, 5/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 14 sources.

About University of Exeter

University of Exeter is a research-led institution in south-west England with four campuses. It ranks among the UK's top 20 universities by research output. The institution focuses on environment, social science, and engineering disciplines alongside traditional humanities and sciences.

Founded
—
Headquarters
GB
Employees
6,075 FTE (HESA EMR 2023/24)
Annual revenue
£665M (HESA EMR 2023/24)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.