The University of Sheffield is a research-intensive higher education institution in northern England.
Is this your business? Add your evidence →
Sheffield publishes mandatory emissions data and has achieved 33% Scope 1+2 reduction since 2005, but Scope 3 remains unquantified and targets have weakened. Gas heating dominates energy; renewable electricity is verified but minimal on-site generation. Research partnership with Drax, the UK's largest CO₂ emitter, attracts credible NGO criticism.
University of Sheffield scores 53/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified September 2026.
That places University of Sheffield joint 80th of 847 companies scored, and joint 16th of 67 in Higher Education / Universities.
Where University of Sheffield sits among higher education / universities peers.
Among the 67 major higher education / universities brands we've scored, University of Sheffield is tied =16th of 67, with 10 others.
Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.
Drought-tolerant planting, cleaning practice changes, no pollution incidents.
Proportional statement only; no verified absolute Scope 3 tonnes CO₂e total for 2023/24.
Differential mowing, no-spray zones, ~10,400 trees (2:1 replacement), 800 m² wildflower turf (2024–25), habitat features.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Add your evidence, £99
Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.
Evidence review →Go tender-ready, £495 a year
A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).
Get in touch →Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Controversies & Red Flags (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (4/10, 5/10).
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above University of Sheffield.
Strathclyde has cut absolute emissions 40% since 2018/19 and publishes credible HESA-verified data, but missed its own 70%-by-2025 interim target by half.
See the breakdown →Bristol has cut Scope 1+2 emissions 56% since 2005 and publishes verified data.
See the breakdown →Cranfield has cut operational emissions 51% since 2005 and publishes credible data, but Scope 3 remains unmeasured and unverified.
See the breakdown →The formula and all 17 sources.
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale17 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
“Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions 2023/24: 28,339.6 tCO₂e (HESA Table-3, UKPRN 10007157)”
“The University purchases 100% renewable electricity; gross figures do not accurately portray the carbon intensity of our electricity supply.”
“our purchased electricity is sourced solely from solar, wind, and hydro power, and this is audited and verified by the independent third party, Eco Act”
“Scope 3 emissions account for around 90 per cent of the University's total carbon footprint.”
“We have already reduced our Scope 1 and 2 emissions by more than 40 per cent since our 2018/19 baseline”
“better data on our supply chains, travel, IT, food and waste has revealed that some of our early assumptions were overly optimistic”
“the entire University's estate will be supplied with our zero carbon, 100% renewable annually matched electricity, sourced from Solar, Wind and/or Hydro power”
“We remain heavily reliant on natural gas for space and water heating, and for our on-site combined heat and power engine.”
“In 2023 we published the third edition of our Biodiversity Action Plan, with new actions such as supporting hedgehog recovery and improving ecological connections.”
“Planted an additional 314 trees, bringing the total number of trees on campus to around 10,400.”
“the University has added 800 square metres of wildflower turf across campus”
“purchased goods and services account for around 60% of our total carbon emissions, far outweighing the impact of waste disposal itself”
“At Sheffield, we recognise that sustainable development cannot be adequately addressed by a single individual or team working in isolation.”
“The University of Sheffield has become a founding signatory of a new declaration of climate expectations.”
“Maintained £0 invested in fossil fuels and continued to increase the proportion of positive investments.”
“Environmental campaigners have mounted a demonstration on the campus of Sheffield University against the institution's research partnership with Drax power station.”
“By partnering with Drax for carbon capture research, the University is aligning itself with an environmentally damaging, high-polluting corporation.”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
The University of Sheffield is a research-intensive higher education institution in northern England. It operates multiple campuses with significant estate and energy footprint, conducting research across STEM, social sciences, and humanities. A member of the Russell Group, Sheffield engages with industry partnerships including energy and technology sectors.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
See what's behind your number →Fees pay for the review, never the result.