Too Good To Go is a Copenhagen-based SaaS marketplace connecting consumers with surplus food from restaurants, bakeries, and grocery stores at discounted prices.
Is this your business? Add your evidence →
Too Good To Go's core mission—reducing food waste—delivers genuine environmental impact, offsetting weak operational climate reporting. The company stopped disclosing emissions data after 2020 when its verification partner Planetly shut down. Growth from 350 to 1,900 employees since 2019 almost certainly increased absolute emissions, yet no post-2020 figures exist. B Corp certification and clean regulatory record are genuine strengths; climate strategy is not.
Too Good To Go scores 53/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.
That places Too Good To Go joint 80th of 847 companies scored, and joint 15th of 76 in SaaS / Digital Services.
Where Too Good To Go sits among saas / digital services peers.
Among the 76 major saas / digital services brands we've scored, Too Good To Go is tied =15th of 76, with 3 others.
Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.
Only disclosed emissions figure: 2,475 tCO₂e (2020).
No formal Scope 3 quantification by category published post-2021.
No disclosure of renewable electricity percentage for offices or data hosting.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Add your evidence, £99
Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.
Evidence review →Go tender-ready, £495 a year
A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).
Get in touch →Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Transparency & Accountability (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (2/10, 3/10).
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Too Good To Go.
Library of Things has negligible operational emissions and structurally reduces consumption through product sharing.
See the breakdown →Atlassian's absolute emissions rose 129% since FY2019, driven by Scope 3 cloud and travel growth.
See the breakdown →Wren is a carbon offset platform operating in a structurally contested market.
See the breakdown →The formula and all 11 sources.
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale11 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Too Good To Go is a Copenhagen-based SaaS marketplace connecting consumers with surplus food from restaurants, bakeries, and grocery stores at discounted prices. Founded in 2016, the company operates in 19 countries and has saved over 135 million meals from waste. Its core business model directly addresses food waste reduction—a major lever for environmental impact.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
See what's behind your number →Fees pay for the review, never the result.