SaaS / Digital Services·Palo Alto, United States·Founded 2010

Pinterest sustainability score: 53/100

Pinterest is a visual discovery and bookmarking platform founded in 2010, headquartered in Palo Alto.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewThin evidence· 6 src

Pinterest has solid emissions tracking and a 19% Scope 3 reduction from 2019–2021, but most recent figures are three years old. Cloud dependency on AWS masks direct control. The company lacks formal biodiversity assessment, water disclosure, and board-level sustainability governance. Clean environmental record with proactive climate misinformation bans, but shallow commitments across resource and nature categories.

Pinterest scores 53/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.

That places Pinterest joint 80th of 847 companies scored, and joint 15th of 76 in SaaS / Digital Services.

At a glance

Pinterest's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Its record on controversies8/10
  • Emissions from its own operations6/10
Weakest
  • Its effect on nature3/10
  • How it uses materials and handles waste3/10
See all ten questions ↓
Pinterest in context

How does Pinterest compare with other saas / digital services companies?

Where Pinterest sits among saas / digital services peers.

Among the 76 major saas / digital services brands we've scored, Pinterest is tied =15th of 76, with 3 others.

=15/76
Pinterest's rank
42
Industry average
25
Industry low
71
Industry high
See all 76 in SaaS / Digital Services →
What would raise this score

Where Pinterest lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Its effect on nature3/10

    As a digital platform, Pinterest has no land use, deforestation, or direct ecosystem impact.

  2. How it uses materials and handles waste3/10

    Digital platform with minimal material footprint; e-waste and office recycling programmes are not publicly disclosed.

  3. Its effect on water3/10

    Pinterest is a digital services company with no significant direct water consumption or pollution risk.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Pinterest

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Pinterest doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Carbon Footprint — Operations (8/10, 6/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Resource Use & Waste (3/10, 3/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 6 sources.

About Pinterest

Pinterest is a visual discovery and bookmarking platform founded in 2010, headquartered in Palo Alto. As a born-in-the-cloud SaaS business, it hosts content and user data primarily via AWS infrastructure. The platform has 500+ million monthly active users and generates revenue through advertising and creator tools.

Founded
2010
Headquarters
Palo Alto, United States
Employees
~4,666
Annual revenue
~$3.65B
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.