Water & Sewerage·Reading, United Kingdom·Founded 1989

Thames Water sustainability score: 36/100

Thames Water Utilities Limited supplies water and sewerage services to London and the Thames Valley.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

36/100
Pending reviewMixed evidence· 9 src

The Environment Agency rated Thames Water 1 star ('poor performing company') for 2024, and in 2025 Ofwat imposed a record £122.7m penalty. In 2025/26 it had 24 serious pollution incidents, discharge permit compliance of 88.22% and average leakage of 573.7 Ml/d. No third-party assurance of its greenhouse gas figures was found. Its zero market-based Scope 2 relies on supplier renewable electricity, and its reported Scope 3 covers operational categories only, with no capital carbon.

Thames Water scores 36/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified October 2026.

That places Thames Water joint 459th of 847 companies scored, and 11th of 11 in Water & Sewerage.

At a glance

Thames Water's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its own operations6/10
  • How clean its energy is6/10
Weakest
  • Its effect on water1/10
  • Its record on controversies2/10
See all ten questions ↓
Thames Water in context

How does Thames Water compare with other water & sewerage companies?

Thames Water sits at the bottom of the water & sewerage pack.

Among the 11 major water & sewerage brands we've scored, Thames Water sits 11th of 11.

11/11
Thames Water's rank
42
Industry average
36
Industry low
50
Industry high
See all 11 in Water & Sewerage →
What would raise this score

Where Thames Water lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Its effect on water1/10

    Event-duration monitoring and 15.1% three-year leakage reduction do not offset scale of pollution.

  2. Its record on controversies2/10

    Ofwat imposed record £122.7m penalty (£104.5m for wastewater), finding Thames Water 'failed to protect the environment'.

  3. Whether its emissions are falling3/10

    Scope 1 rose in 2024/25: wastewater 215.9 to 220.2 kt, water 8.8 to 9.7 kt.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Thames Water

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Thames Water doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Energy Source (6/10, 6/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Controversies & Red Flags (1/10, 2/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 9 sources.

About Thames Water

Thames Water Utilities Limited supplies water and sewerage services to London and the Thames Valley. It was formed on privatisation in 1989 and is headquartered in Reading. Its filed accounts for the year to 31 March 2026 report revenue of £3,756.5m, including £140.9m passed through for the Thames Tideway Tunnel, and an average of 8,472 permanent employees. It is regulated by Ofwat and the Environment Agency.

Founded
1989
Headquarters
Reading, United Kingdom
Employees
~8,472
Annual revenue
£3,756.5M (FY2025/26, year to 31 March 2026)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.