Is this your business? Add your evidence →
Okta scores 46/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified September 2026.
That places Okta joint 235th of 847 companies scored, and joint 28th of 76 in SaaS / Digital Services.
Where Okta sits among saas / digital services peers.
Among the 76 major saas / digital services brands we've scored, Okta is tied =28th of 76, with 1 other.
Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.
Okta is a SaaS company with no manufacturing, agriculture, or land-use operations.
Its inherent water impact is low — no manufacturing, no significant process water use, and no water-intensive supply chain.
No quantified waste reduction targets or aggregate diversion data across all sites were found.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Add your evidence, £99
Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.
Evidence review →Go tender-ready, £495 a year
A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).
Get in touch →Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Carbon Footprint — Operations (9/10, 8/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Water Impact (4/10, 4/10).
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Okta.
OLIO's business model is built on food waste reduction—its core product works.
See the breakdown →Oracle reports comprehensive Scope 1 & 2 emissions with third-party assurance, but absolute emissions haven't declined despite growth claims.
See the breakdown →The formula and all 16 sources.
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale16 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
“Apex Companies LLC was engaged to conduct an independent verification of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and electricity data reported by Okta”
“With the help of a third-party consultant, we conduct a GHG emissions analysis, which includes our Scope 1, Scope 2 and relevant Scope 3 emissions categories”
“'99% of Okta's greenhouse gas emissions come from the vendors in our value chain,' explains Sophia Gluck”
“As of the end of FY2025, 34% of our suppliers by spend have set validated SBTs”
“In FY24, Okta's total scope 1 and 2 emissions maintained a 74% decrease relative to our FY20 baseline”
“we achieved 100% renewable electricity to match the electricity consumption of our global offices, the estimated electricity consumption of our remote workforce”
“Mapping plastics is not an immediate priority as we are a software company and do not manufacture products”
“A core part of our program is to require all our offices to participate in recycling and composting efforts”
“Measuring waste generated from our business operations at select sites”
“The LEED standard, from the U.S. Green Building Council, signifies that a building's features reduce energy and water consumption as well as waste”
“Integrating climate into our enterprise-wide risk management process, in line with the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures”
“This fact sheet covers reporting period FY2025 (February 1, 2024 - January 31, 2025)”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
See what's behind your number →Fees pay for the review, never the result.