Warburtons is a British bakery manufacturer founded in 1876 and headquartered in Bolton.
Is this your business? Add your evidence →
Warburtons operates without published absolute emissions data, interim climate targets, or formal sustainability reporting. A major industrial bakery claiming 20% historical CO₂ reductions refuses to disclose tonnages or Scope 3 figures. Renewable electricity procurement and zero food waste to landfill are genuine, but gas-fired ovens and unverified supply chain claims leave the picture incomplete.
Warburtons scores 38/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.
That places Warburtons joint 410th of 847 companies scored, and joint 32nd of 46 in Food & Beverage (non-meat).
Where Warburtons sits among food & beverage (non-meat) peers.
Among the 46 major food & beverage (non-meat) brands we've scored, Warburtons is tied =32nd of 46, with 3 others.
Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.
Company states it has 'mapped entire carbon footprint from tractor to toaster' but publishes no Scope 3 tonnage, categories, or methodology.
Claims 18.8% reduction since 2007/08 and 20% over past decade, but no year-on-year absolute figures from 2022–2024.
No interim targets, SBTi alignment, science-based milestones, base year, or verified absolute baseline.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Add your evidence, £99
Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.
Evidence review →Go tender-ready, £495 a year
A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).
Get in touch →Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Energy Source (7/10, 5/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain and Emissions Trajectory (2/10, 2/10).
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Warburtons.
Huel is a mid-sized plant-based nutrition company with B Corp certification, but its sustainability claims rest on partial data.
See the breakdown →BrewDog has abandoned false carbon-negative claims and disclosed Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions with third-party calculation, but lacks science-based targets, multi-year emissions reductions, and credible supplier engagement.
See the breakdown →Lavazza reports emissions and publishes annual sustainability updates, but relies heavily on offsetting for near-term targets and lacks SBTi validation.
See the breakdown →The formula and all 7 sources.
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale7 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
This company's public sustainability disclosure is limited. This score is based on the 7 verified sources cited below, rather than padded to a standard count.
Limited data coverage. This assessment is based on 7 sources, 57% of which are self-reported by the company. Scores may change as independent evidence becomes available.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Warburtons is a British bakery manufacturer founded in 1876 and headquartered in Bolton. Operating 11 bakeries and 18 depots with ~5,000 employees, it produces bread, crumpets, bagels, and related bakery products across the UK. It is family-owned and unquoted, with significant FMCG distribution.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
See what's behind your number →Fees pay for the review, never the result.