LEGO is a privately held toy manufacturer headquartered in Billund, Denmark, producing interlocking plastic bricks for construction play.
Is this your business? Add your evidence →
LEGO reports comprehensive Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions with third-party verification, but total emissions have risen 56% since its 2019 SBTi baseline despite a stated 37% reduction target. Operations and energy are well-managed; the real weakness is a growing supply chain footprint paired with a fundamentally linear plastic production model that contradicts net-zero ambitions.
LEGO scores 42/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.
That places LEGO joint 317th of 847 companies scored, and joint 13th of 45 in FMCG / Consumer Goods.
Where LEGO sits among fmcg / consumer goods peers.
Among the 45 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, LEGO is tied =13th of 45, with 3 others.
Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.
FY2024 showed a dip to ~1.7M, but the overall trend is sharply upward driven by production growth.
However, core business uses ~100,000 tonnes petrochemical-derived plastic annually with significant upstream extraction impact.
LEGO is member of National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), identified by InfluenceMap as engaging on climate policy with predominantly negative positions; no formal review of association climate engagement published.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Add your evidence, £99
Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.
Evidence review →Go tender-ready, £495 a year
A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).
Get in touch →Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Energy Source (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (2/10, 4/10).
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above LEGO.
Imperial Brands discloses substantial carbon reductions in operations (72% S1+S2) and has SBTi-validated net-zero targets, but structural harms persist: tobacco farming drives deforestation and water contamination, 4.5 trillion cigarette butts remain unaddressed, and the company actively lobbies against tobacco regulation while greenwashing via ESG awards.
See the breakdown →Who Gives A Crap has built genuine credibility through B Corp certification, FSC Chain-of-Custody accreditation, and zero-virgin-pulp sourcing.
See the breakdown →Natracare reports its first comprehensive carbon footprint (2,664 tCO2e, 99% Scope 3) but the Scope 3 calculation is internally inconsistent, missing end-of-life and downstream transport.
See the breakdown →The formula and all 17 sources.
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale17 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
10 of 17 sources are independent of the company.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
LEGO is a privately held toy manufacturer headquartered in Billund, Denmark, producing interlocking plastic bricks for construction play. Founded in 1949, it is one of the world's largest toy companies by revenue, with global manufacturing and a direct-to-consumer digital presence. The company operates within the FMCG and consumer goods sector.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
See what's behind your number →Fees pay for the review, never the result.