Food Service / Restaurants·Irvine, United States·Founded 1962

Taco Bell sustainability score: 32/100

Taco Bell is a fast-casual Mexican-inspired restaurant chain owned by Yum!

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewStrong evidence· 12 src

Taco Bell's sustainability record is weak across climate, plastics, and water. Parent company Yum! Brands reports limited scope-3 progress (1% reduction vs. 46% target), relies on intensity-based metrics that mask absolute emission growth, and had its net-zero commitment removed by SBTi in 2024. Greenwashing criticism over sauce packet recycling and minimal renewable energy adoption (2% of system) underscore a pattern of low ambition.

Taco Bell scores 32/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.

That places Taco Bell joint 557th of 847 companies scored, and joint 29th of 49 in Food Service / Restaurants.

At a glance

Taco Bell's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its own operations5/10
  • How openly it reports5/10
Weakest
  • Its effect on water2/10
  • Emissions from its supply chain3/10
See all ten questions ↓
Taco Bell in context

How does Taco Bell compare with other food service / restaurants companies?

Where Taco Bell sits among food service / restaurants peers.

Among the 49 major food service / restaurants brands we've scored, Taco Bell is tied =29th of 49, with 3 others.

=29/49
Taco Bell's rank
35
Industry average
19
Industry low
51
Industry high
See all 49 in Food Service / Restaurants →
What would raise this score

Where Taco Bell lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Its effect on water2/10

    Brands states water quantification 'was not possible due to data challenges.' No sub-metering or consumption monitoring.

  2. Emissions from its supply chain3/10

    Yum! reports Scope 3 franchise energy at 152 MT CO2e per restaurant but has not granularly quantified full Scope 3.

  3. Whether its emissions are falling3/10

    Scope 3 supply chain shows only 1% reduction against 46% by 2030 target.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Taco Bell

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Taco Bell doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Transparency & Accountability (5/10, 5/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (2/10, 3/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 12 sources.

About Taco Bell

Taco Bell is a fast-casual Mexican-inspired restaurant chain owned by Yum! Brands, operating ~2,000 company-owned and ~6,800 franchised locations across North America and internationally. Founded in 1962, it is a dominant player in the quick-service restaurant sector, known for value-focused menu items and high-volume operations.

Founded
1962
Headquarters
Irvine, United States
Employees
~175,000
Annual revenue
~$17B (system sales)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.