Sustainability comparison

Ford Motor Company vs General Motors Sustainability: SINK Score Comparison

Ford Motor Company scores 5 points higher than General Motors on SINK's sustainability index.

Question-by-question

How each category compares

Category
Ford
General
Carbon Footprint — Operations
8/10
8/10
Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain
7/10
6/10
Emissions Trajectory
5/10
3/10
Energy Source
6/10
5/10
Nature & Biodiversity Impact
4/10
2/10
Resource Use & Waste
6/10
5/10
Water Impact
7/10
5/10
Targets & Commitments
6/10
6/10
Transparency & Accountability
8/10
6/10
Controversies & Red Flags
2/10
1/10
Frequently asked

Ford Motor Company vs General Motors, answered.

Which is more sustainable, Ford Motor Company or General Motors?

Ford Motor Company is more sustainable according to SINK's open sustainability index, scoring 31/100 vs General Motors's 26/100, a difference of 5 points.

What is Ford Motor Company's SINK sustainability score?

Ford Motor Company scores 31/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Below expectations). Ford's emissions are rising operationally while absolute reductions rely on lower sales volumes, not decarbonisation. Scope 3 intensity has barely moved. The company actively lobbies against climate policy—backing fuel-standard rollbacks and opposing EV mandates—which directly undermines its stated climate commitments.

What is General Motors's SINK sustainability score?

General Motors scores 26/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Significant gaps). GM reports 2.3 Mt of operational emissions, with a selection of its GHG data third-party verified, but Scope 3 rose from 327 Mt in 2022 to 388 Mt in 2024 despite intensity targets, and it is not shown as assured. GM paid nearly $146M in a 2024 EPA settlement over vehicles found to emit more CO2 than certified (it denied wrongdoing), and it lobbies against vehicle-emission rules.

How does SINK compare Ford Motor Company and General Motors?

Both companies are rated on the same 10-question SINK rubric: Scope 1/2/3 carbon footprint, energy source, nature and biodiversity, resource use, water, emissions trajectory, science-based targets, transparency, and controversies. Scores are 0–100, based on public data, and fully reproducible.

See the full leaderboard: 847 companies ranked.

View the full leaderboard →