Ford Motor Company scores 5 points higher than General Motors on SINK's sustainability index.
Ford Motor Company is more sustainable according to SINK's open sustainability index, scoring 31/100 vs General Motors's 26/100, a difference of 5 points.
Ford Motor Company scores 31/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Below expectations). Ford's emissions are rising operationally while absolute reductions rely on lower sales volumes, not decarbonisation. Scope 3 intensity has barely moved. The company actively lobbies against climate policy—backing fuel-standard rollbacks and opposing EV mandates—which directly undermines its stated climate commitments.
General Motors scores 26/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Significant gaps). GM reports 2.3 Mt of operational emissions, with a selection of its GHG data third-party verified, but Scope 3 rose from 327 Mt in 2022 to 388 Mt in 2024 despite intensity targets, and it is not shown as assured. GM paid nearly $146M in a 2024 EPA settlement over vehicles found to emit more CO2 than certified (it denied wrongdoing), and it lobbies against vehicle-emission rules.
Both companies are rated on the same 10-question SINK rubric: Scope 1/2/3 carbon footprint, energy source, nature and biodiversity, resource use, water, emissions trajectory, science-based targets, transparency, and controversies. Scores are 0–100, based on public data, and fully reproducible.
See the full leaderboard: 847 companies ranked.
View the full leaderboard →