Sustainability comparison

Apple Inc. vs Samsung Electronics Sustainability: SINK Score Comparison

Apple Inc. scores 12 points higher than Samsung Electronics on SINK's sustainability index.

Question-by-question

How each category compares

Category
Apple
Samsung
Carbon Footprint — Operations
8/10
7/10
Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain
8/10
6/10
Emissions Trajectory
4/10
2/10
Energy Source
9/10
5/10
Nature & Biodiversity Impact
5/10
4/10
Resource Use & Waste
7/10
6/10
Water Impact
6/10
7/10
Targets & Commitments
6/10
3/10
Transparency & Accountability
7/10
6/10
Controversies & Red Flags
5/10
4/10
Frequently asked

Apple Inc. vs Samsung Electronics, answered.

Which is more sustainable, Apple Inc. or Samsung Electronics?

Apple Inc. is more sustainable according to SINK's open sustainability index, scoring 40/100 vs Samsung Electronics's 28/100, a difference of 12 points.

What is Apple Inc.'s SINK sustainability score?

Apple Inc. scores 40/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Below expectations). Apple's total emissions fell from 23.2 Mt in FY2021 to 15.3 Mt in FY2025 but were flat from FY2024 to FY2025, and product-related Scope 3 rose in FY2025. Product manufacturing is the largest source at 8.15 Mt. A Frankfurt court barred 'CO2-neutral' Apple Watch advertising in 2025, and its carbon-neutral claims rely partly on avoidance credits.

What is Samsung Electronics's SINK sustainability score?

Samsung Electronics scores 28/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Significant gaps). Samsung discloses emissions comprehensively but is failing to reduce them. Operational emissions rose 7.8% in 2024; total emissions including supply chain increased despite net-zero rhetoric. The company's 2050 net-zero target covers only 16% of emissions and lacks SBTi validation. Unvalidated targets, late Scope 3 disclosure, and planned massive semiconductor expansion undermine credibility.

How does SINK compare Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics?

Both companies are rated on the same 10-question SINK rubric: Scope 1/2/3 carbon footprint, energy source, nature and biodiversity, resource use, water, emissions trajectory, science-based targets, transparency, and controversies. Scores are 0–100, based on public data, and fully reproducible.

See the full leaderboard: 847 companies ranked.

View the full leaderboard →