Renewable Energy / Clean Energy Generation·Aarhus, Denmark·Founded 1945

Vestas Wind Systems sustainability score: 57/100

Vestas Wind Systems designs, manufactures, installs and services wind turbines globally.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewMixed evidence· 17 src

Vestas leads on renewable energy sourcing and transparency but stumbles on absolute emissions reduction and biodiversity. Its intensity-based Scope 3 target masks rising absolute supply chain emissions. Will miss its 2025 interim target. Lacks formal biodiversity commitments despite offshore wind exposure.

Vestas Wind Systems scores 57/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.

That places Vestas Wind Systems joint 28th of 847 companies scored, and 2nd of 2 in Renewable Energy / Clean Energy Generation.

At a glance

Vestas Wind Systems's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its own operations8/10
  • How clean its energy is8/10
Weakest
  • Its effect on nature4/10
  • Whether its emissions are falling5/10
See all ten questions ↓
Vestas Wind Systems in context

How does Vestas Wind Systems compare with other renewable energy / clean energy generation companies?

Vestas Wind Systems sits at the bottom of the renewable energy / clean energy generation pack.

Among the 2 major renewable energy / clean energy generation brands we've scored, Vestas Wind Systems sits 2nd of 2.

2/2
Vestas Wind Systems's rank
60
Industry average
57
Industry low
63
Industry high
1Ørsted A/S
63
2Vestas Wind Systems
57
See all 2 in Renewable Energy / Clean Energy Generation →
What would raise this score

Where Vestas Wind Systems lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Its effect on nature4/10

    Does not consider biodiversity financially material and has not set biodiversity targets, citing measurement challenges.

  2. Whether its emissions are falling5/10

    Scope 1+2 declined 109Kt to 105Kt.

  3. Its effect on water5/10

    No quantified water reduction targets or baseline consumption figures disclosed publicly.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Vestas Wind Systems

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Vestas Wind Systems doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Energy Source (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Emissions Trajectory (4/10, 5/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 17 sources.

About Vestas Wind Systems

Vestas Wind Systems designs, manufactures, installs and services wind turbines globally. Founded 1945, headquartered in Aarhus, Denmark, it employs 29,000 and generated €14.5bn revenue in 2022. As the world's leading wind energy company, it supplies onshore and offshore turbines to utility-scale projects across six continents.

Founded
1945
Headquarters
Aarhus, Denmark
Employees
~35,100
Annual revenue
~€17.3B
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.