FMCG / Consumer Goods·London, United Kingdom·Founded 1929

Unilever sustainability score: 29/100

Unilever is a multinational FMCG conglomerate headquartered in London, operating across personal care, home care, foods, and refreshment categories.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

29/100
Significant gaps-11 since last review
40th of 45 in FMCG / Consumer Goods
Pending reviewStrong evidence· 12 src

Unilever has reduced operational emissions 77% but Scope 3 is rising, missing 1.5°C targets by 45%. Plastic targets revised downward with 700kt annually still in use. Two regulatory greenwashing findings and a credible NGO report on insufficient climate ambition expose gaps between stated commitments and measurable outcomes.

Unilever scores 29/100 (Significant gaps) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.

That places Unilever joint 634th of 847 companies scored, and 40th of 45 in FMCG / Consumer Goods.

At a glance

Unilever's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its own operations7/10
  • How openly it reports7/10
Weakest
  • Whether its emissions are falling4/10
  • How it uses materials and handles waste5/10
See all ten questions ↓
Unilever in context

How does Unilever compare with other fmcg / consumer goods companies?

Where Unilever sits among fmcg / consumer goods peers.

Among the 45 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Unilever sits 40th of 45.

40/45
Unilever's rank
39
Industry average
23
Industry low
56
Industry high
See all 45 in FMCG / Consumer Goods →
What would raise this score

Where Unilever lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Whether its emissions are falling4/10

    Scope 3 (direct) rose 3.12% in 2024, declined only 1.4% in 2023.

  2. How it uses materials and handles waste5/10

    Virgin plastic reduced 29% by end-2025, missing original 50%-by-2025 target; revised to 30% by 2026, 40% by 2028.

  3. Its effect on water5/10

    Consumer-use water (99% of total footprint) lacks formal tracking or reduction target.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Unilever

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Unilever doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Transparency & Accountability (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Resource Use & Waste (4/10, 5/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 12 sources.

About Unilever

Unilever is a multinational FMCG conglomerate headquartered in London, operating across personal care, home care, foods, and refreshment categories. With €60bn annual revenue and 148,000 employees, it ranks among the largest consumer goods manufacturers globally, making its supply chain sustainability material to millions of tonnes of agricultural commodities annually.

Founded
1929
Headquarters
London, United Kingdom
Employees
~148,000 (2021)
Annual revenue
60,073,000,000 EUR (FY2022)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.