Subaru Corporation manufactures automobiles and automotive components, headquartered in Ebisu, Japan.
Is this your business? Add your evidence →
Subaru reports comprehensive emissions data across Scope 1, 2, and 3, but total emissions rose 28% year-on-year while BEV penetration stalled at 1.9% globally against a 2030 target of 50%. The company faces a credibility gap: self-set targets lack SBTi validation, supply chain emissions are rising unchecked, and past test-data falsification raises systemic integrity questions.
Subaru scores 29/100 (Significant gaps) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.
That places Subaru joint 634th of 847 companies scored, and joint 11th of 24 in Automotive.
Where Subaru sits among automotive peers.
Among the 24 major automotive brands we've scored, Subaru is tied =11th of 24, with 1 other.
Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.
BEV sales reached only 1.9% of global sales against 50% 2030 target.
Subaru of Indiana facility claims 100% renewable energy via certificates, but one facility does not constitute Group coverage.
No TNFD adoption, no quantified nature footprint, and no systematic biodiversity impact assessments across supply chain.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Add your evidence, £99
Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.
Evidence review →Go tender-ready, £495 a year
A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).
Get in touch →Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (6/10, 6/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Energy Source (2/10, 3/10).
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Subaru.
Ford's emissions are rising operationally while absolute reductions rely on lower sales volumes, not decarbonisation.
See the breakdown →BMW reports comprehensive operational emissions data and has achieved 100% renewable electricity at production sites since 2020.
See the breakdown →JLR reports operational emissions reductions and renewable energy progress at UK sites, but critical weaknesses undermine credibility: Scope 3 targets are intensity-based despite 22% sales growth, making absolute emissions reductions unlikely.
See the breakdown →The formula and all 12 sources.
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Subaru Corporation manufactures automobiles and automotive components, headquartered in Ebisu, Japan. Founded in 1953, the company operates globally with approximately 16,961 employees as of 2022. It is a mid-sized automaker competing against Toyota, Honda, and Volkswagen, with a regional market presence in North America and Japan.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
See what's behind your number →Fees pay for the review, never the result.