Financial Services / Banking·London, United Kingdom·Founded 1804

Schroders sustainability score: 42/100

Schroders is a London-based asset manager founded in 1804, managing investments across equities, bonds, alternatives, and real estate.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewStrong evidence· 15 src

Schroders has decarbonised operations rapidly—56% Scope 1 cuts since 2019, 100% renewable electricity achieved—but its core financed-emissions footprint remains unabated. Portfolio temperature alignment is intensity-based, not absolute. Strongest weakness: absence of hard Scope 3 financed-emissions reduction targets.

Schroders scores 42/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified August 2026.

That places Schroders joint 317th of 847 companies scored, and joint 11th of 51 in Financial Services / Banking.

At a glance

Schroders's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • How clean its energy is9/10
  • Emissions from its own operations8/10
Weakest
  • Emissions from its supply chain4/10
  • How it uses materials and handles waste5/10
See all ten questions ↓
Schroders in context

How does Schroders compare with other financial services / banking companies?

Where Schroders sits among financial services / banking peers.

Among the 51 major financial services / banking brands we've scored, Schroders is tied =11th of 51, with 1 other.

=11/51
Schroders's rank
37
Industry average
20
Industry low
65
Industry high
See all 51 in Financial Services / Banking →
What would raise this score

Where Schroders lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Emissions from its supply chain4/10

    Financed emissions ~160 million tCO₂e in 2024, 4.97% year-on-year decrease, but intensity-based not absolute target.

  2. How it uses materials and handles waste5/10

    Comprehensive global office waste reduction targets and verified circularity metrics not found across estate.

  3. Its effect on water5/10

    No corporate-level water stewardship programme, watershed engagement, or verified own-operations consumption data publicly available.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Schroders

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Schroders doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Energy Source and Carbon Footprint — Operations (9/10, 8/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain and Resource Use & Waste (4/10, 5/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 15 sources.

About Schroders

Schroders is a London-based asset manager founded in 1804, managing investments across equities, bonds, alternatives, and real estate. With 3,500 employees, it operates globally as an active investment firm holding broad-market portfolios including significant fossil-fuel sector exposure.

Founded
1804
Headquarters
London, United Kingdom
Employees
~3,500
Annual revenue
~£2.3B
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.