Electronics / Hardware·Seoul, South Korea·Founded 1958

LG Electronics sustainability score: 32/100

LG Electronics is a South Korean multinational manufacturer of consumer electronics, home appliances, and displays, headquartered in Seoul.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

32/100
Below expectations-12 since last review
Joint 20th of 33 in Electronics / Hardware
Pending reviewStrong evidence· 13 src

LG has strong absolute emissions reductions in operations and comprehensive waste recycling, but renewable energy penetration remains under 20% despite RE100 membership. Scope 3 targets are intensity-based rather than absolute, masking potential total emissions growth. Water and biodiversity disclosures lack quantified outcomes.

LG Electronics scores 32/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.

That places LG Electronics joint 557th of 847 companies scored, and joint 20th of 33 in Electronics / Hardware.

At a glance

LG Electronics's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its own operations8/10
  • How it uses materials and handles waste8/10
Weakest
  • Its effect on nature3/10
  • How clean its energy is4/10
See all ten questions ↓
LG Electronics in context

How does LG Electronics compare with other electronics / hardware companies?

Where LG Electronics sits among electronics / hardware peers.

Among the 33 major electronics / hardware brands we've scored, LG Electronics is tied =20th of 33, with 2 others.

=20/33
LG Electronics's rank
37
Industry average
20
Industry low
64
Industry high
See all 33 in Electronics / Hardware →
What would raise this score

Where LG Electronics lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Its effect on nature3/10

    No TNFD-aligned disclosure or quantified biodiversity footprint.

  2. How clean its energy is4/10

    As of 2022, renewable conversion was only 8.2%.

  3. Its effect on water4/10

    No publicly available quantitative consumption data, reduction targets, or year-on-year performance metrics disclosed.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For LG Electronics

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is LG Electronics doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Resource Use & Waste (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Energy Source (3/10, 4/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 13 sources.

About LG Electronics

LG Electronics is a South Korean multinational manufacturer of consumer electronics, home appliances, and displays, headquartered in Seoul. Founded in 1958, it operates globally across consumer products, commercial solutions, and component manufacturing, ranking among the world's largest electronics conglomerates.

Founded
1958
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Employees
~75,000
Annual revenue
~$63.8B (KRW 88T)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.