Hospitality / Hotels

Landal GreenParks sustainability score: 26/100

Landal GreenParks operates more than 200 holiday parks across Europe, mainly in the Netherlands and Germany, offering vacation accommodation and leisure facilities.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewMixed evidence· 11 src

Landal discloses only partial, unverified operational emissions (46 kt CO₂) with no Scope 3 inventory, no multi-year trajectory, and no sustainability report since 2021–2022. Heating remains fossil-fueled despite a 2030 climate-neutral pledge. A contested park development near protected nature adds reputational risk.

Landal GreenParks scores 26/100 (Significant gaps) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified October 2026.

That places Landal GreenParks joint 710th of 847 companies scored, and 13th of 13 in Hospitality / Hotels.

At a glance

Landal GreenParks's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Its record on controversies7/10
  • How clean its energy is5/10
Weakest
  • Emissions from its supply chain1/10
  • Emissions from its own operations2/10
See all ten questions ↓
Landal GreenParks in context

How does Landal GreenParks compare with other hospitality / hotels companies?

Landal GreenParks sits at the bottom of the hospitality / hotels pack.

Among the 13 major hospitality / hotels brands we've scored, Landal GreenParks sits 13th of 13.

13/13
Landal GreenParks's rank
42
Industry average
26
Industry low
56
Industry high
See all 13 in Hospitality / Hotels →
What would raise this score

Where Landal GreenParks lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Emissions from its supply chain1/10

    No Scope 3 inventory found.

  2. Emissions from its own operations2/10

    Landal reports only 46 kilotonnes CO₂ annually with no methodology, Scope 1/2 split, or verification.

  3. Whether its emissions are falling2/10

    No published absolute emissions trend.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Landal GreenParks

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Landal GreenParks doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Energy Source (7/10, 5/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain and Carbon Footprint — Operations (1/10, 2/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 11 sources.

About Landal GreenParks

Landal GreenParks operates more than 200 holiday parks across Europe, mainly in the Netherlands and Germany, offering vacation accommodation and leisure facilities. Founded in 1954 and headquartered in Amsterdam, it merged with Roompot in 2023 and the combined group trades as Landal. The company positions itself as an eco-conscious hospitality operator but lacks comprehensive sustainability disclosure.

Founded
—
Headquarters
Netherlands
Employees
Not found (no authoritative figure located)
Annual revenue
€845.2M (FY2025)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.