Jimmy Choo is a London-based luxury footwear and accessories brand founded in 1996, owned by Capri Holdings.
Is this your business? Add your evidence →
Jimmy Choo discloses emissions only at parent-company level with no brand-specific quantification. Scope 3 emissions are rising, deforestation risk in leather supply chains remains unaddressed despite policy commitments, and science-based targets lack net-zero validation. Forest 500 and Good On You both rate the company poorly on environmental ambition.
Jimmy Choo scores 31/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.
That places Jimmy Choo joint 588th of 847 companies scored, and 35th of 41 in Apparel (Durable / Outdoor).
Where Jimmy Choo sits among apparel (durable / outdoor) peers.
Among the 41 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, Jimmy Choo sits 35th of 41.
Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.
No Jimmy Choo-specific Scope 1 or 2 emissions disclosed.
Stand.earth explicitly states trajectory is unclear.
Jimmy Choo targets 10% water reduction in key suppliers by 2025 but reports no quantified consumption data.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Add your evidence, £99
Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.
Evidence review →Go tender-ready, £495 a year
A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).
Get in touch →Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Energy Source (5/10, 4/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Emissions Trajectory (2/10, 2/10).
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Jimmy Choo.
Bottega Veneta publishes no brand-level sustainability data, relying entirely on Kering Group reporting.
See the breakdown →Valentino reports carbon reductions and renewable energy commitments but lacks science-based targets, supply chain transparency, and water disclosure.
See the breakdown →Everlane publishes annual impact reports, reports a 52% absolute cut in Scope 1–3 emissions against its 2019 baseline and has SBTi-validated Scope 1 and 2 targets, but its Scope 3 target is intensity-based rather than absolute.
See the breakdown →The formula and all 6 sources.
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale6 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
This company's public sustainability disclosure is limited. This score is based on the 6 verified sources cited below, rather than padded to a standard count.
Limited data coverage. This assessment is based on 6 sources, 33% of which are self-reported by the company. Scores may change as independent evidence becomes available.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Jimmy Choo is a London-based luxury footwear and accessories brand founded in 1996, owned by Capri Holdings. Known for handcrafted women's shoes and leather goods, it operates approximately 234 stores globally and positions itself in the premium segment of the apparel and accessories market.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
See what's behind your number →Fees pay for the review, never the result.