Consulting / Professional Services·London, United Kingdom·Founded 1885

Intertek sustainability score: 41/100

Intertek is a UK-based testing, inspection, and certification (TIC) company founded in 1885.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewMixed evidence· 12 src

Intertek has met its near-term SBTi emissions targets early with verified 54.7% absolute reductions in Scope 1+2 by 2025. However, Scope 3 disclosure remains narrow—only 3 of 15 categories quantified—and critical supply chain emissions unquantified. Water, waste, and biodiversity lack measurable data. A greenwashing enablement controversy via its CarbonZero certification service undercuts credibility.

Intertek scores 41/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified August 2026.

That places Intertek joint 343rd of 847 companies scored, and joint 13th of 16 in Consulting / Professional Services.

At a glance

Intertek's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its own operations8/10
  • Whether its emissions are falling7/10
Weakest
  • Emissions from its supply chain4/10
  • Its effect on nature4/10
See all ten questions ↓
Intertek in context

How does Intertek compare with other consulting / professional services companies?

Where Intertek sits among consulting / professional services peers.

Among the 16 major consulting / professional services brands we've scored, Intertek is tied =13th of 16, with 1 other.

=13/16
Intertek's rank
50
Industry average
22
Industry low
62
Industry high
See all 16 in Consulting / Professional Services →
What would raise this score

Where Intertek lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Emissions from its supply chain4/10

    Purchased goods, upstream transport, downstream use-phase unquantified.

  2. Its effect on nature4/10

    Testing/inspection operator with minimal land footprint—no extraction or agricultural operations.

  3. How it uses materials and handles waste4/10

    No quantified waste volumes, hazardous/non-hazardous split, or landfill diversion rates disclosed.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Intertek

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Intertek doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Emissions Trajectory (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (4/10, 4/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 12 sources.

About Intertek

Intertek is a UK-based testing, inspection, and certification (TIC) company founded in 1885. Operating in 100+ countries, it provides assurance services to manufacturing, energy, consumer, and infrastructure sectors. Listed on the London Stock Exchange; subject to private equity takeover bid as of 2026.

Founded
1885
Headquarters
London, United Kingdom
Employees
~45,000
Annual revenue
~£3.43B
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.