Food & Beverage (non-meat)·Southampton, United Kingdom·Founded 1999

Innocent Drinks sustainability score: 51/100

Innocent Drinks is a UK-based juice and smoothie maker founded in 1999, headquartered in Southampton.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

51/100
Making progress-2 since last review
Joint 9th of 46 in Food & Beverage (non-meat)
Pending reviewStrong evidence· 16 src

Innocent has made genuine emissions reductions and invested in renewable energy at its new factory, but intensity-based supply chain targets allow absolute emissions to rise with growth. A misleading advertising ruling, ownership by Coca-Cola, and a supplier linked to Doñana wetland water extraction expose structural greenwashing risks that its B Corp status does not fully address.

Innocent Drinks scores 51/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.

That places Innocent Drinks joint 126th of 847 companies scored, and joint 9th of 46 in Food & Beverage (non-meat).

At a glance

Innocent Drinks's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its supply chain7/10
  • How clean its energy is7/10
Weakest
  • Whether its emissions are falling4/10
  • Its effect on water4/10
See all ten questions ↓
Innocent Drinks in context

How does Innocent Drinks compare with other food & beverage (non-meat) companies?

Where Innocent Drinks sits among food & beverage (non-meat) peers.

Among the 46 major food & beverage (non-meat) brands we've scored, Innocent Drinks is tied =9th of 46, with 1 other.

=9/46
Innocent Drinks's rank
43
Industry average
19
Industry low
57
Industry high
See all 46 in Food & Beverage (non-meat) →
What would raise this score

Where Innocent Drinks lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Whether its emissions are falling4/10

    Total emissions fell from 275,000 tonnes (2019) to 228,146 tonnes (2022), but Scope 3 rose 3% year-on-year.

  2. Its effect on water4/10

    However, one supplier linked to unsustainable extraction at Doñana UNESCO wetland.

  3. Its effect on nature5/10

    No TNFD-aligned disclosure or quantified nature footprint.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Innocent Drinks

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Innocent Drinks doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain and Energy Source (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Water Impact (4/10, 4/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 16 sources.

About Innocent Drinks

Innocent Drinks is a UK-based juice and smoothie maker founded in 1999, headquartered in Southampton. Owned 90%+ by Coca-Cola, it produces fruit-based beverages sold across Europe. The company positions sustainability as central to its brand but operates within a corporate structure known for plastic pollution.

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Southampton, United Kingdom
Employees
~500-870
Annual revenue
~£466M (2024)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.