Is this your business? Add your evidence →
Hollister Incorporated scores 42/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified August 2026.
That places Hollister Incorporated joint 317th of 847 companies scored, and 10th of 19 in Healthcare / Pharmaceuticals.
Where Hollister Incorporated sits among healthcare / pharmaceuticals peers.
Among the 19 major healthcare / pharmaceuticals brands we've scored, Hollister Incorporated sits 10th of 19.
Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.
No TNFD disclosure, no formal biodiversity policy, and no deforestation commitment is found for Hollister Incorporated.
No water consumption data, water reduction targets, or water stewardship programme details are publicly accessible for Hollister Incorporated in any indexed sustainability report excerpt.
However, no absolute Scope 3 tonnage figures are publicly available in indexed sources.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Add your evidence, £99
Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.
Evidence review →Go tender-ready, £495 a year
A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).
Get in touch →Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Emissions Trajectory (7/10, 5/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Water Impact (2/10, 2/10).
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Hollister Incorporated.
Roche has achieved strong operational decarbonisation (46% S1&2 reduction since 2022) and received SBTi validation for net-zero targets — a pharma first.
See the breakdown →AbbVie has achieved meaningful absolute emissions reductions and maintains science-aligned near-term climate targets, but obscures its full supply chain footprint and lacks net-zero validation.
See the breakdown →Philips demonstrates strong climate governance with SBTi-validated targets, 80% renewable energy, and A-list CDP scores across 11 years.
See the breakdown →Hollister Incorporated's score has moved from 26 to 42 across 3 recorded reviews, up 16 points.
Rescore 43→42 (score-company publish)
Initial score 43 (score-company publish)
Rescore 43→26 (score-company publish)
The formula and all 11 sources.
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale11 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
This is Hollister Incorporated, the employee-owned US medical-device maker (ostomy and continence care) — not the Abercrombie & Fitch apparel brand of the same name (scored separately as Hollister Co.). As a private company it discloses no global revenue figure.
“Achieved 13% reduction in Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions compared to our 2022 baseline”
“Reduction of Scope 1 & 2 emissions by 42% by 2030 from a 2022 baseline”
“Reduce our Scope 3 emissions by 25% by 2030 from a 2022 baseline in purchased goods and services”
“Hollister has manufacturing facilities in Ireland, India, Denmark, Lithuania, and the US”
“In 2023, we achieved several sustainability-related milestones, including reducing our Scope 1 and 2 emissions globally”
“Hollister Medical India Ltd (500 kWp) in Bawal, Haryana. Rooftop solar for a healthcare manufacturing facility”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
See what's behind your number →Fees pay for the review, never the result.