Retail (non-fashion)·Redditch, England·Founded 1892

Halfords sustainability score: 43/100

Halfords is a UK-listed retailer and automotive services operator founded in 1892, headquartered in Redditch.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewThin evidence· 7 src

Halfords has published SBTi-aligned targets but is moving backwards: Scope 1+2 emissions rose 8.5% year-on-year, renewable electricity remains at zero, and Scope 3 is unmeasured despite dominating the footprint. The company discloses formally as a listed retailer but lacks third-party verification, nature assessment, and credible execution evidence.

Halfords scores 43/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.

That places Halfords joint 296th of 847 companies scored, and joint 13th of 48 in Retail (non-fashion).

At a glance

Halfords's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Its record on controversies7/10
  • How openly it reports6/10
Weakest
  • Whether its emissions are falling2/10
  • Emissions from its supply chain3/10
See all ten questions ↓
Halfords in context

How does Halfords compare with other retail (non-fashion) companies?

Where Halfords sits among retail (non-fashion) peers.

Among the 48 major retail (non-fashion) brands we've scored, Halfords is tied =13th of 48, with 3 others.

=13/48
Halfords's rank
38
Industry average
18
Industry low
52
Industry high
See all 48 in Retail (non-fashion) →
What would raise this score

Where Halfords lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Whether its emissions are falling2/10

    The company targets 42% reduction by 2030 but current trajectory contradicts that goal.

  2. Emissions from its supply chain3/10

    However, no full quantified Scope 3 inventory has been published, despite supply chain emissions being the dominant category for a global product retailer sourcing automotive and cycling goods.

  3. How clean its energy is3/10

    No evidence of current renewable sourcing, RE100 membership, PPAs, or on-site generation.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Halfords

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Halfords doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Transparency & Accountability (7/10, 6/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (2/10, 3/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 7 sources.

About Halfords

Halfords is a UK-listed retailer and automotive services operator founded in 1892, headquartered in Redditch. It operates retail stores and autocentres selling bicycles, automotive parts, cycling accessories, and servicing vehicles. As a major multi-channel retailer with global sourcing and a substantial service footprint, it holds a mid-market position in UK retail.

Founded
1892
Headquarters
Redditch, England
Employees
~12,000
Annual revenue
~£1.8B
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.