Higher Education / Universities

Glasgow School of Art sustainability score: 46/100

Glasgow School of Art is a specialist art and design institution, headquartered in Glasgow, Scotland.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewMixed evidence· 8 src

Glasgow School of Art demonstrates real emissions reductions (31.9% intensity improvement over nine years) and exceptional waste management (93.9% recycling), but lags critically on renewable energy—zero on-site generation and no confirmed green tariff. Supply chain emissions remain largely unmapped. Net zero commitments lack science-based validation.

Glasgow School of Art scores 46/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified September 2026.

That places Glasgow School of Art joint 235th of 847 companies scored, and joint 56th of 67 in Higher Education / Universities.

At a glance

Glasgow School of Art's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Its record on controversies8/10
  • Emissions from its own operations6/10
Weakest
  • How clean its energy is2/10
  • Emissions from its supply chain3/10
See all ten questions ↓
Glasgow School of Art in context

How does Glasgow School of Art compare with other higher education / universities companies?

Where Glasgow School of Art sits among higher education / universities peers.

Among the 67 major higher education / universities brands we've scored, Glasgow School of Art is tied =56th of 67, with 1 other.

=56/67
Glasgow School of Art's rank
49
Industry average
20
Industry low
60
Industry high
See all 67 in Higher Education / Universities →
What would raise this score

Where Glasgow School of Art lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. How clean its energy is2/10

    HESA reports 0.0% on-site renewable generation; green tariff procurement not reported.

  2. Emissions from its supply chain3/10

    Procurement-related supply chain emissions not quantified.

  3. Its effect on nature3/10

    Inner-city 66,757 m² art school with no significant land holdings or agricultural activity.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Glasgow School of Art

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Glasgow School of Art doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Carbon Footprint — Operations (8/10, 6/10). Weakest on Energy Source and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (2/10, 3/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 8 sources.

About Glasgow School of Art

Glasgow School of Art is a specialist art and design institution, headquartered in Glasgow, Scotland. With approximately 2,400 students and 800 staff, it operates a 66,757 m² urban campus in Garnethill. The school combines studio-based arts education with research, including environmental architecture and urban design programmes.

Founded
—
Headquarters
GB
Employees
515 FTE (HESA EMR 2023/24)
Annual revenue
£47.8M (HESA EMR 2023/24)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.