Food & Beverage (non-meat)·Luxembourg·Founded 1946

Ferrero sustainability score: 44/100

Ferrero is a Luxembourg-based confectionery and food manufacturer with €19.3bn revenue and 48,697 employees.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewStrong evidence· 13 src

Ferrero has made genuine progress on operational emissions (21.7% Scope 1&2 reduction) and renewable energy (90% globally), but Scope 3—where most emissions live—is tracked only by intensity, not absolute cuts. Supply chain deforestation risk persists despite 'deforestation-free' claims. Child labour in hazelnuts and greenwashing criticism undermine credibility.

Ferrero scores 44/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.

That places Ferrero joint 278th of 847 companies scored, and joint 18th of 46 in Food & Beverage (non-meat).

At a glance

Ferrero's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • How clean its energy is7/10
  • Emissions from its own operations6/10
Weakest
  • Its effect on water4/10
  • Emissions from its supply chain5/10
See all ten questions ↓
Ferrero in context

How does Ferrero compare with other food & beverage (non-meat) companies?

Where Ferrero sits among food & beverage (non-meat) peers.

Among the 46 major food & beverage (non-meat) brands we've scored, Ferrero is tied =18th of 46, with 6 others.

=18/46
Ferrero's rank
43
Industry average
19
Industry low
57
Industry high
See all 46 in Food & Beverage (non-meat) →
What would raise this score

Where Ferrero lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Its effect on water4/10

    However, multiple plants failed to report key metrics; no global absolute withdrawal figure disclosed.

  2. Emissions from its supply chain5/10

    Scope 3 is mapped with FLAG and non-FLAG disaggregation as of FY2023/24, but no publicly verified absolute Scope 3 total in tonnes CO2e was found.

  3. Whether its emissions are falling5/10

    However, Scope 3 trajectory is not documented in absolute terms; the intensity-based target may mask rising absolute emissions as revenue grows 8–21% annually.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Ferrero

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Ferrero doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Energy Source and Carbon Footprint — Operations (7/10, 6/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (4/10, 5/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 13 sources.

About Ferrero

Ferrero is a Luxembourg-based confectionery and food manufacturer with €19.3bn revenue and 48,697 employees. It produces chocolate, hazelnut spreads, and packaged foods globally, owning brands including Nutella, Ferrero Rocher, and Tic Tac. Founded in 1946, it is one of the world's largest cocoa and palm oil buyers.

Founded
1946
Headquarters
Luxembourg
Employees
~48,697 (2025)
Annual revenue
€19.3B (FY2025)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.