Apparel (Fast Fashion)·Yamaguchi City, Japan·Founded 1963

Fast Retailing sustainability score: 33/100

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

33/100
Pending review

Fast Retailing scores 33/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified August 2026.

That places Fast Retailing joint 539th of 847 companies scored, and 6th of 21 in Apparel (Fast Fashion).

At a glance

Fast Retailing's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its own operations7/10
  • How clean its energy is7/10
Weakest
  • Its effect on nature3/10
  • How it uses materials and handles waste4/10
See all ten questions ↓
Fast Retailing in context

How does Fast Retailing compare with other apparel (fast fashion) companies?

Where Fast Retailing sits among apparel (fast fashion) peers.

Among the 21 major apparel (fast fashion) brands we've scored, Fast Retailing sits 6th of 21.

6/21
Fast Retailing's rank
24
Industry average
8
Industry low
40
Industry high
See all 21 in Apparel (Fast Fashion) →
What would raise this score

Where Fast Retailing lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Its effect on nature3/10

    However, no quantified nature footprint exists, TNFD disclosure is absent, and Stand.earth found 'no evidence of impact yet' for regenerative farming claims.

  2. How it uses materials and handles waste4/10

    However, Good On You notes Uniqlo does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials used, RE.UNIQLO results are not disclosed, and Stand.earth identifies resale/repair as limited (56 stores across 22 countries).

  3. Its effect on water4/10

    However, no absolute water consumption data for operations or supply chain is publicly disclosed (intensity targets only), and Ceres Valuing Water Finance Initiative Benchmark 2023 coverage flagged as relevant for apparel.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Fast Retailing

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Fast Retailing doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Energy Source (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Resource Use & Waste (3/10, 4/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 9 sources.

About Fast Retailing
Founded
1963
Headquarters
Yamaguchi City, Japan
Employees
~20,853 (2025)
Annual revenue
~¥3.4tn (~$22.3B, FY2025, Fast Retailing Group)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.