Is this your business? Add your evidence →
Fast Retailing scores 33/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified August 2026.
That places Fast Retailing joint 539th of 847 companies scored, and 6th of 21 in Apparel (Fast Fashion).
Where Fast Retailing sits among apparel (fast fashion) peers.
Among the 21 major apparel (fast fashion) brands we've scored, Fast Retailing sits 6th of 21.
Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.
However, no quantified nature footprint exists, TNFD disclosure is absent, and Stand.earth found 'no evidence of impact yet' for regenerative farming claims.
However, Good On You notes Uniqlo does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials used, RE.UNIQLO results are not disclosed, and Stand.earth identifies resale/repair as limited (56 stores across 22 countries).
However, no absolute water consumption data for operations or supply chain is publicly disclosed (intensity targets only), and Ceres Valuing Water Finance Initiative Benchmark 2023 coverage flagged as relevant for apparel.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Add your evidence, £99
Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.
Evidence review →Go tender-ready, £495 a year
A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).
Get in touch →Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Energy Source (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Resource Use & Waste (3/10, 4/10).
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Fast Retailing.
Gap Inc. operates a fast-fashion model with serious emissions backsliding: Scope 1&2 reductions fell from 77% (2022) to 74% (2024), and absolute emissions have risen recently despite long-term baseline improvements.
See the breakdown →River Island has validated net-zero targets but shows no evidence of tracking toward them.
See the breakdown →New Look reports SBTi-validated carbon targets and has achieved 22% Scope 1&2 reductions, but water data is entirely absent and renewable energy coverage remains unquantified.
See the breakdown →The formula and all 9 sources.
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale9 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
Scored as Fast Retailing Co., Ltd (TSE:9983), the listed parent whose group sustainability disclosure the score rests on. Uniqlo — the original search term — is its principal brand (~80% of group revenue).
“We obtained assurance by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd. for fiscal 2025 indicated with ★.”
“Fast Retailing publishes data about its own operations through CDP and on its website, but does not publish any data on energy and electricity consumption and sourcing in its supply chain.”
“Fast Retailing shrank its Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 90.3 percent by 2025, five years earlier than planned.”
“The brand must work to remedy its upstream transport emissions, as this has incurred a sharp increase of 81% compared to its 2019 baseline.”
“Fast Retailing aims for zero deforestation and will avoid sourcing from forests at risk of deforestation.”
“As of December 31, 2023, 51% of factories achieved a reduction of 10% or more in water withdrawal per unit.”
“We are promoting initiatives for zero discharge of hazardous chemicals in the production process by joining the ZDHC Group.”
“This company has a zero or very low Engagement Intensity score on climate policy.”
“Uniqlo's owner Fast Retailing scored D-, and the organisation stated: 'Fast Retailing has acted slowly to phase down...'”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
See what's behind your number →Fees pay for the review, never the result.