FMCG / Consumer Goods·Malle, Belgium·Founded 1976

Ecover sustainability score: 34/100

Ecover is a Belgian maker of plant-based cleaning products and laundry detergents founded in 1976, known for phosphate-free formulations and biodegradable solutions.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewMixed evidence· 11 src

Ecover has strong circular economy credentials and water-quality heritage, but its climate performance is severely hampered by parent SC Johnson's refusal to report quantified emissions. No Scope 3 disclosure, no GHG Protocol alignment, and eight-year-old operational data make carbon claims unverifiable. Political donations to climate-obstructive candidates add reputational risk.

Ecover scores 34/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.

That places Ecover joint 505th of 847 companies scored, and joint 33rd of 45 in FMCG / Consumer Goods.

At a glance

Ecover's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • How it uses materials and handles waste7/10
  • Its record on controversies6/10
Weakest
  • Emissions from its supply chain1/10
  • Emissions from its own operations2/10
See all ten questions ↓
Ecover in context

How does Ecover compare with other fmcg / consumer goods companies?

Where Ecover sits among fmcg / consumer goods peers.

Among the 45 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Ecover is tied =33rd of 45, with 2 others.

=33/45
Ecover's rank
39
Industry average
23
Industry low
56
Industry high
See all 45 in FMCG / Consumer Goods →
What would raise this score

Where Ecover lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Emissions from its supply chain1/10

    SC Johnson does not report Scope 3 emissions.

  2. Emissions from its own operations2/10

    SC Johnson, parent since 2017, reports no quantifiable Scope 1/2 emissions—only proportional charts.

  3. Whether its emissions are falling2/10

    SC Johnson claims 71% GHG reduction since 2000 but provides no published absolute tonnes to verify.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Ecover

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Ecover doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Resource Use & Waste and Controversies & Red Flags (7/10, 6/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain and Carbon Footprint — Operations (1/10, 2/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 11 sources.

About Ecover

Ecover is a Belgian maker of plant-based cleaning products and laundry detergents founded in 1976, known for phosphate-free formulations and biodegradable solutions. Owned by SC Johnson since 2017, it operates manufacturing in Europe with strong waste diversion and refill-model initiatives. Mid-sized FMCG player competing in the sustainable cleaning segment.

Founded
1976
Headquarters
Malle, Belgium
Employees
~300
Annual revenue
~£101M
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.