Eat Natural manufactures cereal and snack bars from a facility in Halstead, UK.
Is this your business? Add your evidence →
Eat Natural publishes no emissions data, renewable energy figures, or sustainability targets despite operating a 100-million-bar-per-year food factory. The company is excluded from parent Ferrero's reporting scope. Core weaknesses: zero Scope 1, 2, and 3 disclosure; no decarbonisation trajectory; unverified plastic-offset claim masking actual use.
Eat Natural scores 31/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.
That places Eat Natural joint 588th of 847 companies scored, and 43rd of 46 in Food & Beverage (non-meat).
Where Eat Natural sits among food & beverage (non-meat) peers.
Among the 46 major food & beverage (non-meat) brands we've scored, Eat Natural sits 43rd of 46.
Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.
Eat Natural has published no emissions data.
2018 Brazil nut shortage support via CIPCA shows supply chain awareness but no emissions measurement or supplier engagement programme exists.
No emissions baseline or reduction pathway disclosed.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Add your evidence, £99
Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.
Evidence review →Go tender-ready, £495 a year
A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).
Get in touch →Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (7/10, 3/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (1/10, 1/10).
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Eat Natural.
Starbucks discloses comprehensive emissions data but is failing to reduce them—total emissions up 3% against a 50% reduction target by 2030.
See the breakdown →Monster's emissions are rising 17% year-on-year while absolute reduction targets remain unvalidated.
See the breakdown →Red Bull has no quantified emissions data, no supply chain transparency, and growing production volumes with zero evidence of absolute emissions decline.
See the breakdown →The formula and all 8 sources.
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale8 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Eat Natural manufactures cereal and snack bars from a facility in Halstead, UK. Founded in 1976, it sources nuts, seeds, dried fruits, and chocolate globally and exports to 37 countries. Wholly owned by Ferrero Group since December 2020, it positions itself on natural ingredients and community partnerships but operates outside its parent's formal sustainability reporting.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
See what's behind your number →Fees pay for the review, never the result.