Professional Sports Clubs·Founded 1883

Coventry City Football Club sustainability score: 23/100

Coventry City Football Club is a professional football club competing in England's EFL Championship.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewStrong evidence· 17 src

Coventry City operates without formal emissions data, renewable energy strategy, or climate targets. The club discloses sustainability initiatives operationally—reusable cups, sustainable packaging, kit supplier practices—but lacks governance structure, third-party verification, and measurable commitments. No controversies identified, but transparency and accountability are minimal.

Coventry City Football Club scores 23/100 (Significant gaps) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified August 2026.

That places Coventry City Football Club joint 767th of 847 companies scored, and 20th of 22 in Professional Sports Clubs.

At a glance

Coventry City Football Club's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Its record on controversies8/10
  • How it uses materials and handles waste4/10
Weakest
  • Its climate targets1/10
  • Emissions from its own operations2/10
See all ten questions ↓
Coventry City Football Club in context

How does Coventry City Football Club compare with other professional sports clubs companies?

Where Coventry City Football Club sits among professional sports clubs peers.

Among the 22 major professional sports clubs brands we've scored, Coventry City Football Club sits 20th of 22.

20/22
Coventry City Football Club's rank
36
Industry average
22
Industry low
58
Industry high
See all 22 in Professional Sports Clubs →
What would raise this score

Where Coventry City Football Club lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Its climate targets1/10

    No formal climate targets, net-zero commitment, SBTi registration, or science-aligned pathway.

  2. Emissions from its own operations2/10

    No Scope 1 or 2 emissions data published.

  3. Emissions from its supply chain2/10

    No Scope 3 emissions quantified.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Coventry City Football Club

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Coventry City Football Club doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Resource Use & Waste (8/10, 4/10). Weakest on Targets & Commitments and Carbon Footprint — Operations (1/10, 2/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 17 sources.

About Coventry City Football Club

Coventry City Football Club is a professional football club competing in England's EFL Championship. Founded in 1883, the club is based in Coventry and operates from the Coventry Building Society Arena, which it does not own. With annual turnover under £30m and approximately 250 staff, it is a mid-sized sports organisation by UK standards.

Founded
1883
Headquarters
GB
Employees
~500
Annual revenue
—
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.