Chemicals·Wilmington, United States·Founded 2018

Corteva Agriscience sustainability score: 29/100

Corteva Agriscience is a US-headquartered pesticide, seed, and crop protection company formed in 2018 from the merger of DowDuPont's agriculture division.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

29/100
Significant gaps
7th of 10 in Chemicals
Pending reviewStrong evidence· 12 src

Corteva reports operational emissions with limited assurance and has set unvalidated climate targets. Supply chain emissions remain massive (5.4M tonnes CO2e) with only intensity reduction commitments. The company faces credible regulatory findings including an FTC loyalty scheme complaint and trades on climate leadership while members of trade associations actively opposing emissions policy.

Corteva Agriscience scores 29/100 (Significant gaps) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.

That places Corteva Agriscience joint 634th of 847 companies scored, and 7th of 10 in Chemicals.

At a glance

Corteva Agriscience's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its own operations6/10
  • How openly it reports5/10
Weakest
  • Emissions from its supply chain3/10
  • Whether its emissions are falling3/10
See all ten questions ↓
Corteva Agriscience in context

How does Corteva Agriscience compare with other chemicals companies?

Where Corteva Agriscience sits among chemicals peers.

Among the 10 major chemicals brands we've scored, Corteva Agriscience sits 7th of 10.

7/10
Corteva Agriscience's rank
32
Industry average
20
Industry low
46
Industry high
See all 10 in Chemicals →
What would raise this score

Where Corteva Agriscience lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Emissions from its supply chain3/10

    However, Scope 3 target is only 20% intensity reduction by 2030—not absolute.

  2. Whether its emissions are falling3/10

    2024 claims 21% intensity reduction, but unvalidated against 2030 target.

  3. How clean its energy is3/10

    Not RE100 member.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Corteva Agriscience

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Corteva Agriscience doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Transparency & Accountability (6/10, 5/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain and Emissions Trajectory (3/10, 3/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 12 sources.

About Corteva Agriscience

Corteva Agriscience is a US-headquartered pesticide, seed, and crop protection company formed in 2018 from the merger of DowDuPont's agriculture division. With 21,000 employees and $17.5 billion revenue (FY2022), it manufactures and distributes seeds, crop chemicals, and agronomic solutions globally. Core business involves pesticide manufacturing and distribution.

Founded
2018
Headquarters
Wilmington, United States
Employees
~21,000
Annual revenue
$17.4B (FY2022)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.