Food Service / Restaurants·Atlanta, Georgia, US·Founded 1946

Chick-fil-A sustainability score: 23/100

Chick-fil-A is the largest chicken-focused quick-service restaurant chain in the US, privately held and headquartered in Atlanta.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewStrong evidence· 13 src

Chick-fil-A operates 3,000+ restaurants generating $22.7B in systemwide sales with no disclosed emissions data, no science-based targets, and no renewable energy strategy beyond three pilot solar projects. The company refuses to report Scope 1, 2, or 3 emissions despite completing internal assessments. Food waste diversion is its only quantified environmental win.

Chick-fil-A scores 23/100 (Significant gaps) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.

That places Chick-fil-A joint 767th of 847 companies scored, and 47th of 49 in Food Service / Restaurants.

At a glance

Chick-fil-A's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Its record on controversies8/10
  • How it uses materials and handles waste4/10
Weakest
  • Emissions from its supply chain0/10
  • Whether its emissions are falling0/10
See all ten questions ↓
Chick-fil-A in context

How does Chick-fil-A compare with other food service / restaurants companies?

Where Chick-fil-A sits among food service / restaurants peers.

Among the 49 major food service / restaurants brands we've scored, Chick-fil-A sits 47th of 49.

47/49
Chick-fil-A's rank
35
Industry average
19
Industry low
51
Industry high
See all 49 in Food Service / Restaurants →
What would raise this score

Where Chick-fil-A lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Emissions from its supply chain0/10

    No Scope 3 emissions quantified or published.

  2. Whether its emissions are falling0/10

    No emissions trajectory disclosed.

  3. Emissions from its own operations1/10

    Chick-fil-A does not publicly report Scope 1 or Scope 2 emissions despite operating 3,000+ energy-intensive restaurants.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Chick-fil-A

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Chick-fil-A doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Resource Use & Waste (8/10, 4/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain and Emissions Trajectory (0/10, 0/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 13 sources.

About Chick-fil-A

Chick-fil-A is the largest chicken-focused quick-service restaurant chain in the US, privately held and headquartered in Atlanta. It operates 3,100+ restaurants across North America with plans for international expansion. The chain is known for its chicken sandwiches, drive-through model, and closed-on-Sundays policy. It ranks among the top five US restaurant chains by systemwide sales.

Founded
1946
Headquarters
Atlanta, Georgia, US
Employees
~200,000
Annual revenue
~$9B (corporate), ~$22.7B (systemwide sales)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.